On 04/01/2012 14:58, Simon Schwarz wrote: > Hi Stefano, > Hi Simon,
> Just FYI: I already did this with DMA - the patch was rejected and I > haven't worked on it since (as you already said it is some work...). Yes, of course - it makes sense to find a solution that will be accepted before implementing it - this is the reason I prepared a way to enable caches, but I have not yet done and I will not do if this solution will be rejected. > It > was really speeding up the copy process. I am sure it is a big improvement... > I have some meassurments on > this and it would be really interesting to compare them with the d-cache > solution. > > If you are interested I can send you my data - so you can compare it > when you have d-cache ready. Ok, understood. Let's see if we can merge soon the patchset into mainline - that opens also the possibility to add further SOCs, not only TI. And then we can proceed optimizing with DMA or d-cache. Best regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
