On Sunday, September 25, 2011 16:18:32 Simon Glass wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Simon Glass wrote: > >> > do_reset() is not supposed to return > >> > >> I have adjusted the function meaning (which luckily for me was not > >> defined) so that it can return -1 on failure. This makes my code > >> correct :-) > >> > >> I think it is reasonable to provide a reset function which might not > >> be able to do its job. That is the current state of sandbox. > > > > No, I don't want to change the current definition of reset(). > > OK. > > > And "not able to do the job" is something different than > > "unimplemented". > > > > Why cannot we do a real reset here? Re-exec'in the running binary or > > performing a longjmp() to the start might be ideas how to implement > > this. > > While this could be done I believe that it might be possible / > desirable to exit out of the main loop, rather than longjmp or > re-exec. I have not implemented it because I have not got to that bit > yet and don't want to put time into a solution I will throw away. > > I'm happy to just put: > > while (1) ; > > in the reset code if you like?
i would expect "reset" in the sandbox to "exit(1)". how else would you exit ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
