Dear Simon Glass, In message <capnjgz1ffrpbu9gtxp9qvm24ln2r-bwu1ojmrl3e+hijjlw...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > > do_reset() is not supposed to return > > I have adjusted the function meaning (which luckily for me was not > defined) so that it can return -1 on failure. This makes my code > correct :-) > > I think it is reasonable to provide a reset function which might not > be able to do its job. That is the current state of sandbox.
No, I don't want to change the current definition of reset(). And "not able to do the job" is something different than "unimplemented". Why cannot we do a real reset here? Re-exec'in the running binary or performing a longjmp() to the start might be ideas how to implement this. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "The value of marriage is not that adults produce children, but that children produce adults." - Peter De Vries _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
