Hi Simon,
On Thursday 28 July 2011 02:08 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
> Add NAND support for the new SPL structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Schwarz<simonschwarz...@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch didn't exist before V2!
>
> V2 changes:
> ADD Some define-barriers for OMAP3 to only use NAND
> ADD nand_load_image() - inits the OMAP gpmc, loads the images - parses the
> header
> CHG cosmetic
> ADD do_reset() implementation for omap-common spl
> ADD nand_copy_image to nand.h
> ADD CPP barriers for mmc and nand support. The parts depending on library
> support are only compiled if the respective library is included.
>
> V3 changes:
> ADD Comment why setup_clocks_for_console() isn't called for OMAP3
> CHG cosmetic (deleted empty line)
> CHG rename of NAND_MODE_HW to NAND_MODE_HW_ECC
> DEL NAND_MODE_SW. Not used.
>
> V4 changes:
> CHG cosmetic - style problems
>
> V5 changes:
> CHG renamed nand_copy_image to nand_spl_load_image
> CHG offs paramter of nand_spl_load_image is of type loff_t now
>
> V6 changes:
> ADD call to nand_deselect after loading the images
> ADD nand_deselect to nand.h
>
> Transition from V1 to V2 also includes that this patch is now based on
> - the new SPL layout by Aneesh V and Daniel Schwierzeck
> - the OMAP4 SPL patches by Aneesh V
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c | 47
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/omap_common.h | 1 +
> include/nand.h | 3 ++
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c
> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c
> index d177652..7ec5c7c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include<asm/u-boot.h>
> #include<asm/utils.h>
> #include<asm/arch/sys_proto.h>
> +#include<nand.h>
> #include<mmc.h>
> #include<fat.h>
> #include<timestamp_autogenerated.h>
> @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ static void parse_image_header(const struct image_header
> *header)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT
> static void mmc_load_image_raw(struct mmc *mmc)
> {
> u32 image_size_sectors, err;
> @@ -140,7 +142,9 @@ end:
> hang();
> }
> }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT
> static void mmc_load_image_fat(struct mmc *mmc)
> {
> s32 err;
> @@ -173,7 +177,9 @@ end:
> hang();
> }
> }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT
> static void mmc_load_image(void)
> {
> struct mmc *mmc;
> @@ -206,6 +212,28 @@ static void mmc_load_image(void)
> hang();
> }
> }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
> +static void nand_load_image(void)
> +{
> + gpmc_init();
> + nand_init();
> + nand_spl_load_image(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS,
> + CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE,
> + (uchar *)CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_DST);
Guess CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_DST is same as CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE. Why
define a new flag then?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_ENV_DST
> + nand_spl_load_image(CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET, CONFIG_ENV_SIZE,
> + (uchar *)CONFIG_NAND_ENV_DST);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET_REDUND
> + nand_spl_load_image(CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET_REDUND, CONFIG_ENV_SIZE,
> + (uchar *)CONFIG_NAND_ENV_DST + CONFIG_ENV_SIZE);
> +#endif
> +#endif
> + nand_deselect();
> + parse_image_header((struct image_header *)CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_DST);
I think you are assuming the image type and size here. Why not do this
as it is done for MMC. That is, read just 1 sector, parse the buffer,
find the size of the image and read only that much subsequently. You
will have to then use u-boot.img instead of u-boot.bin as the payload.
Maybe you should clone arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/config.mk in omap3
folder to get MLO and u-boot.img targets.
best regards,
Aneesh
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
