Hi Tom, Sorry for not spotting this. I will improve the patchset and send a v2.
On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 13:35 -0600, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:46:18AM +0200, Philippe Schenker wrote: > > > From: Philippe Schenker <[email protected]> > > > > > > This series fixes compilation errors when building for R5 cores and > > addresses a security issue where authenticated images were not > > being > > used correctly. > > > > Patch 1: Cosmetic removal of duplicate code > > > > Patches 2-3: Fix build errors caused by type mismatches between > > function signatures and the types used in R5 builds. > > > > Patches 4-5: fix a bug where ti_secure_image_post_process() > > relocates > > images during authentication, but callers were still using the > > original > > unverified addresses. > > > > Patch 6: Implements is_running operation to allow querying R5F core > > status. > > > > Note: If preferred, I can split this series. > > With the series applied, I see warnings now on: > j721e_beagleboneai64_r5 am62x_beagleplay_r5 am67a_beagley_ai_r5 > phycore_am62ax_r5 phycore_am62ax_r5_ethboot phycore_am62ax_r5_usbdfu > phycore_am62x_r5 phycore_am62x_r5_ethboot phycore_am62x_r5_usbdfu > phycore_am64x_r5 am62ax_evm_r5 am62dx_evm_r5 am62px_evm_r5 > am62px_evm_r5_ethboot am62x_evm_r5 am62x_evm_r5_ethboot am62x_lpsk_r5 > am64x_evm_r5 am65x_evm_r5 am65x_evm_r5_usbdfu am65x_evm_r5_usbmsc > j7200_evm_r5 j721e_evm_r5 j721e_sk_r5 am68_sk_r5 am68_sk_r5_ethboot > j721s2_evm_r5 j722s_evm_r5 j722s_evm_r5_ethboot am69_sk_r5 > am69_sk_r5_ethboot j742s2_evm_r5 j784s4_evm_r5 verdin-am62_r5 > verdin-am62p_r5 > like: > arch/arm/mach-k3/security.c:122:20: error: cast to pointer from > integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast] > 122 | *p_image = (void *)image_addr;
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
