On Monday 20 June 2011 09:49 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:52:29 +0530 > "V, Aneesh"<ane...@ti.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Scott Wood<scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:18:57 +0530 >>> Aneesh V<ane...@ti.com> wrote: >>> >>>> @@ -1158,6 +1164,7 @@ clobber: clean >>>> @[ ! -d $(obj)nand_spl ] || find $(obj)nand_spl -name "*" -type l >>>> -print | xargs rm -f >>>> @[ ! -d $(obj)onenand_ipl ] || find $(obj)onenand_ipl -name "*" >>>> -type >>>> l -print | xargs rm -f >>>> @[ ! -d $(obj)mmc_spl ] || find $(obj)mmc_spl -name "*" -type l >>>> -print | xargs rm -f >>>> + @[ ! -d $(obj)spl ] || find $(obj)mmc_spl -name "*" -type l -print | >>>> xargs rm -f >>> >>> That last mmc_spl should just be spl. >>> >>>> +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT) += mmc/libnand.o >>>> +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ONENAND_SUPPORT) += mmc/libonenand.o >> >> Oops!! That was a copy paste error. It was intended to be: >> +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT) += nand/libnand.o >> +LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ONENAND_SUPPORT) += onenand/libonenand.o > > Still, what would go in those files?
That's actually one rule per sub-directory in the directory structure. What goes in there can be decided by the respective Makefile in the sub-directory. It can have more fine-grained selection like what you have mentioned below. > > It'd have to be something more specific, like: > > LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_NAND_SIMPLE) += nand/nand_boot.o > LIBS-$(CONFIG_SYS_SPL_NAND_FSL_ELBC) += nand/nand_boot_fsl_elbc.o > ... > > Hmm, I guess you'd stick this in a recursive makefile. Seems like overkill. > >> The top-level Makefile doesn't include any source files by itself. >> All SPL content comes from one or more of libraries. So, there >> will be at least one library defined, I believe(unless there >> is an error, of course). > > Couldn't there be only OBJS? It looks to me at the moment that the root directory for SPL, 'spl/', need not have any source files. We will have an spl/common directory for such needs(I forgot to add this in the list of libraries) If this framework looks reasonable I shall go ahead an convert the OMAP4 spl to this framework, so that we can thrash out some more details. best regards, Aneesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot