Dear Stefano Babic, In message <4df8a2de.3040...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > Reading rev 2.0 on Felix=B4s case is misleading IMHO as we tend to > > think that we have a TO2.0 silicon on his board even though we get a > > "unknown" string. > > Ok, so only reading the code we can know that version number + "unknown" > give us the value of the srev register. We can explicitely expand the > output to make things clearer.
Given that this is an exotic error case that happens only on a very small number of chips that are actually not supposed to exist at all, I think this is not worth the effort. The "unknown" is warning enough, and anybody who needs to know more details can see theremaining details easily from the code. > Agree with your proposal. No. We should not add code that is almost never ever useful anywhere, just to make this message more verbose. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Was heißt Windows auf Indianisch? - "Weißer Mann, der auf Sanduhr wartet!" _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
