Hi Andre,
On 5/12/25 12:46 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 11:24:07 +0200
Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@cherry.de> wrote:
Hi Andre,
On 5/11/25 3:10 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Add an Operating Performance Points table for the CPU cores to
enable Dynamic Voltage & Frequency Scaling on the A100.
Signed-off-by: Shuosheng Huang <huangshuosh...@allwinnertech.com>
[masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest: fix typos in -cpu-opp, use compatible]
Signed-off-by: Cody Eksal <masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest>
Link:
https://patch.msgid.link/20241031070232.1793078-14-masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org>
[ upstream commit: a8181e6861fec3068f393d77ff81b2aaf4ea4203 ]
Did you use tools/update-subtree.sh to cherry-pick those commits? The
No, I didn't, just remembered that afterwards. This would only work for
this patch anyways, since the other two DT patches are not yet merged in a
tagged release (the last one isn't even reviewed yet), so I just added them
here for completeness, to give people an idea of how the defconfig would
look like and to allow compile testing.
Considering you're the sunxi maintainer, I assume you wouldn't merge the
patches knowing that they are not fitting the expected workflow so I'm
not too worried :)
The plan was to maybe merge the first two patches (the DRAM code and
Kconfig bits), then wait for the DT bits to trickle in.
Sounds like a plan! Have fun :)
Cheers,
Quentin
