Hi Tom, On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 10:16, Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 2025-03-28 16:34, Simon Glass wrote: > > Add support for this new phase, which runs after TPL. It determines the > > state of the machine, then selects which SPL image to use. SDRAM init is > > then done in SPL, so that it is updatable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > (no changes since v2) > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Rewrite help for VPL_ROCKCHIP_COMMON_BOARD > > - Skip spl-boot-order.c for VPL (rather than modifying it) > > > > arch/arm/include/asm/spl.h | 1 + > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Kconfig | 25 +++++- > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/Makefile | 11 ++- > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/Kconfig | 9 ++ > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl.c | 3 + > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/tpl.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/u-boot-vpl-v8.lds | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/vpl.c | 53 +++++++++++ > > common/spl/Kconfig | 1 + > > 9 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/u-boot-vpl-v8.lds > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/vpl.c > > > > This patch and therefore this series does not apply to the next branch. > > Are there any depends that are missing or are you only testing based on > your own fork?
Until we are ready to apply things, yes I am using the sjg tree. See the tags in the cover letters of patches I send. For this one it is: base-commit: 3f76d803db9b500f43bc534465945a8d2836bb3e branch: vbi3 So no, there is nothing else that this series depends on and if you can review it I can send a PR for Tom for -next one all necessary changes are made. Regards, Simon
