On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:55:18PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:

> The logic of this has become too confusing.
> 
> The primary issue with the patch is that U-Boot needs to set up a
> bloblist in the first phase where BLOBLIST is enabled. Subsequent
> phases can then use that bloblist.
> 
> But the first phase of U-Boot cannot assume that one exists.
> 
> Reverting this commit seems like a better starting point for getting
> things working for all use-cases.
> 
> This reverts commit 66131310d8ff1ba228f989b41bd8812f43be41c3.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAPnjgZ3hMHtiH=f5zkxnniofv_-vfryq1gn7qz5hku8wjo8...@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>

Perhaps the answer is to untie "do we have a bloblist / standard passage
handoff" from "allocate and create one". As with your series here you're
no longer declaring one at a fixed address yes?

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to