On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:55:18PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > The logic of this has become too confusing. > > The primary issue with the patch is that U-Boot needs to set up a > bloblist in the first phase where BLOBLIST is enabled. Subsequent > phases can then use that bloblist. > > But the first phase of U-Boot cannot assume that one exists. > > Reverting this commit seems like a better starting point for getting > things working for all use-cases. > > This reverts commit 66131310d8ff1ba228f989b41bd8812f43be41c3. > > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/CAPnjgZ3hMHtiH=f5zkxnniofv_-vfryq1gn7qz5hku8wjo8...@mail.gmail.com/ > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Perhaps the answer is to untie "do we have a bloblist / standard passage handoff" from "allocate and create one". As with your series here you're no longer declaring one at a fixed address yes? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
