Hi Scott, On Tuesday 17 May 2011 12:09 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:40:30 +0530 > Aneesh V<ane...@ti.com> wrote: > >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> On Monday 16 May 2011 01:22 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> I think, in the first step of this series, we should move the existing >>> code from nand_spl and onenand_ipl into something like spl/nand and >>> spl/onenand, respectivly, and make sure all teh existing systems still >>> build. The we can add more such support. >> >> IMHO, we should just have spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/ . >> >> Let spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/Makefile decide what it wants to >> build. > > That's what we do in nand_spl/onenand_spl -- the common files are more like > libraries that the board makefile may or may not pull in (e.g. many > Freescale boards use nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c or nand_boot_fsl_nfc.c instead of > nand_boot.c). > > Renaming nand_spl seems like it should be the first step. > >> I mean something like this(similar changes for ONENAND): >> >> +.PHONEY : SPL > > .PHONY
Oops! I wonder how it was working then. My real patch too had the same mistake! best regards, Aneesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
