On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:40:30 +0530 Aneesh V <ane...@ti.com> wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Monday 16 May 2011 01:22 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > I think, in the first step of this series, we should move the existing > > code from nand_spl and onenand_ipl into something like spl/nand and > > spl/onenand, respectivly, and make sure all teh existing systems still > > build. The we can add more such support. > > IMHO, we should just have spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/ . > > Let spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/Makefile decide what it wants to > build.
That's what we do in nand_spl/onenand_spl -- the common files are more like libraries that the board makefile may or may not pull in (e.g. many Freescale boards use nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c or nand_boot_fsl_nfc.c instead of nand_boot.c). Renaming nand_spl seems like it should be the first step. > I mean something like this(similar changes for ONENAND): > > +.PHONEY : SPL .PHONY -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
