On 22/04/11 22:46, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message <4db15dd7.8050...@gmail.com> you wrote: >> >>> I think it wouldbe even better if we could push our changes back into >>> the "mainline" version of checkpatch, so that the U-Boot specific >>> behaviour can beenabled by a command line option (checkpatch --uboot ?). >>> >>> Forking is not so preferrable here, I think. >> >> I agree, but if the Linux guys won't accept patches for U-Boot specific >> semantics, what choice do we have? > > Did you ask him, and he refused, or is this just a hypothetical > question? >
I have now asked on LKML - Let's see what unfolds... Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
