Dear Graeme Russ, In message <4db0cf2f.2020...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > That said, if someone wants to maintain a U-Boot version, that'd be great. > > So, if someone maintains a U-Boot fork of checkpatch, keeps it up-to-date > with the Linux version, and pushes patches back up to Linux (to keep them > is sync as much as practicable possible) would we agree that that would be > the most favoured solution? > > I'm looking at checkpatch now (and its change history) - If I think I can > take it on, I will send out a call for U-Boot specific checkpatch features
I think it wouldbe even better if we could push our changes back into the "mainline" version of checkpatch, so that the U-Boot specific behaviour can beenabled by a command line option (checkpatch --uboot ?). Forking is not so preferrable here, I think. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Phone Company." _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot