Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
>> Il 19/04/2011 16:18, Detlev Zundel ha scritto:
>>> Hi Luca,
>>>
>>>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>>>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli<luca.ceres...@comelit.it>
>>>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk<w...@denx.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - fixed checkpatch issues.
>>>>
>>>> net/tftp.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>>> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/tftp.c b/net/tftp.c
>>>> index 00abec3..da545c6 100644
>>>> --- a/net/tftp.c
>>>> +++ b/net/tftp.c
>>>> @@ -55,18 +55,18 @@ enum {
>>>> TFTP_ERR_FILE_ALREADY_EXISTS = 6,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> -static IPaddr_t TftpServerIP;
>>>> -static int TftpServerPort; /* The UDP port at their end
>>>> */
>>>> -static int TftpOurPort; /* The UDP port at our end
>>>> */
>>>> +static IPaddr_t TftpRemoteIP;
>>>> +static int TftpRemotePort; /* The UDP port at their end
>>>> */
>>>> +static int TftpOurPort; /* The UDP port at our end
>>>> */
>>>> static int TftpTimeoutCount;
>>>> -static ulong TftpBlock; /* packet sequence number
>>>> */
>>>> -static ulong TftpLastBlock; /* last packet sequence number
>>>> received */
>>>> -static ulong TftpBlockWrap; /* count of sequence number
>>>> wraparounds */
>>>> -static ulong TftpBlockWrapOffset; /* memory offset due to
>>>> wrapping */
>>>> +static ulong TftpBlock; /* packet sequence number
>>>> */
>>>> +static ulong TftpLastBlock; /* last packet sequence number received
>>>> */
>>>> +static ulong TftpBlockWrap; /* count of sequence number wraparounds
>>>> */
>>>> +static ulong TftpBlockWrapOffset; /* memory offset due to wrapping
>>>> */
>>> These changes are indentation only changes, so they should be in a
>>> separate patch.
>> It's needed for checkpatch compliance.
> I'm trying to understand the problems involved, but looking at this
> again, it is not clear to me what you say here. When I run your version
> 1 of the patches (where you only do the rename) through checkpatch, I
> get:
>
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #116: FILE: net/tftp.c:59:
> +static int TftpRemotePort; /* The UDP port at their end
> */
>
> WARNING: consider using kstrto* in preference to simple_strtol
> #215: FILE: net/tftp.c:619:
> + TftpRemotePort = simple_strtol(ep, NULL, 10);
>
> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 99 lines checked
>
> /home/dzu/transfer/p2 has style problems, please review. If any of these
> errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>
> So I'm not sure why you say that the other changes are needed for
> checkpatch. What exactly do you mean by this?
All the comments were nicely columned before my patchset. Reducing the
length of a line would have broken this.
I chose to change all of them in order to preserve the pre-existing
coding style.
Luca
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
