Dear Andreas Bießmann, > Am 19.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Reinhard Meyer: > >> Dear Andreas Bießmann, >>>> Some of the patches did not apply. What did apply is now found in >>>> u-boot-atmel/next2. >>>> >>>> I have no idea why they do not apply, since the AVR32 part has not changed >>>> since 110202. >>> >>> I can check that and will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next. >> >> Applied to u-boot-atmel/next. >> >>> BTW I personally dislike your inflationary creation of new branches. The >>> last days I could not understand why there are that much reworkXXX >>> branches for AT91 stuff. >> >> Those have a date which reflect the u-boot-arm/master they were rebased >> onto. I rather only >> remove them if and when all patches have been pulled into u-boot-arm (just >> in case). > > Ok, but changes to origin/master from 20101209 in rework101209 are not > included in rework101217? This would not make sense to me.
I said nothing like that. > >>> I hope only the one with latest timestamp is >>> worth to work with. Isn't that reworked stuff already in next branch? Or >>> are there some tasks not yet in next branch? >> >> Not all is in next, all changes I did to at9sam9260/9XE/9G20-ek and out own >> board (TOP9000) >> are not yet in next, I had problems rebasing them to current >> u-boot-arm/master and not enough >> time yet to fix that. > > Ok, I've got an at91sam9260ek here and like to get it working with current > mainline (plus the reworking stuff for at91 devices). Which branch should I > take? Which changes are worth to look at for 2011.06 regarding sam9260 > devices or is it too late for that? Top 2 patches in rework110202 should do the trick, once they are made to apply to current next. best regards Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
