Dear Reinhard Meyer, Am 19.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear Andreas Bießmann, >>> Some of the patches did not apply. What did apply is now found in >>> u-boot-atmel/next2. >>> >>> I have no idea why they do not apply, since the AVR32 part has not changed >>> since 110202. >> >> I can check that and will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next. > > Applied to u-boot-atmel/next. > >> BTW I personally dislike your inflationary creation of new branches. The >> last days I could not understand why there are that much reworkXXX >> branches for AT91 stuff. > > Those have a date which reflect the u-boot-arm/master they were rebased onto. > I rather only > remove them if and when all patches have been pulled into u-boot-arm (just in > case). Ok, but changes to origin/master from 20101209 in rework101209 are not included in rework101217? This would not make sense to me. >> I hope only the one with latest timestamp is >> worth to work with. Isn't that reworked stuff already in next branch? Or >> are there some tasks not yet in next branch? > > Not all is in next, all changes I did to at9sam9260/9XE/9G20-ek and out own > board (TOP9000) > are not yet in next, I had problems rebasing them to current > u-boot-arm/master and not enough > time yet to fix that. Ok, I've got an at91sam9260ek here and like to get it working with current mainline (plus the reworking stuff for at91 devices). Which branch should I take? Which changes are worth to look at for 2011.06 regarding sam9260 devices or is it too late for that? best regards Andreas Bießmann _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
