On 6/4/24 05:34, Brunham, Kalen wrote:
Hi Tom/Heinrich,
I have https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/574 that has a proposed change. It
is currently failing clang sandbox, which looks a little strange and I'm
looking into it. Please let me know if you have any feedback on the general
strategy.
Thanks,
-Kalen
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 1:23 PM
To: Brunham, Kalen <kalen.brun...@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com>; Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>;
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org>; U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added arm64 assembly for examples/api crt0
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:16:38AM +0000, Brunham, Kalen wrote:
Thanks Tom.
Can you suggest who is the existing owner of this code I could work with?
You should CC Heinrich for sure once you have things working.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 12:03 PM
To: Brunham, Kalen <kalen.brun...@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com>; Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>;
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org>; U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Added arm64 assembly for examples/api crt0
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:53:17PM +0000, Brunham, Kalen wrote:
Hi Tom,
What are next steps on this change?
I'm committed to the idea of EFI apps opposed to examples/standalone.
EFI currently requires block devices which is not enabled when only using flash.
Should config BLK be updated to include DM_SPI_FLASH?
The UEFI implementation should not depend on DM_SPI_FLASH.
You could make BLK manually selectable again instead:
diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
index 6ad18889f61..1f0e1010f0e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
config BLK
- bool # "Support block devices"
+ bool "Support block devices"
Cf. 0417b8523c47 ("blk: Hide the BLK and SPL_LEGACY_BLOCK options")
Best regards
Heinrich
Should we explore how to remove BLK as a dependency for EFI_LOADER?
Yes, someone needs to explore how to cleanly make BLK optional for EFI_LOADER.
--
Tom
