Dear Lei Wen,
In message <1301586774-25447-1-git-send-email-lei...@marvell.com> you wrote:
> Some hardware would dysfunctional if only access the register by
> byte. This patch is tend to recover original access the responding
> register according to CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE.
Can you please explain on what board, and with which tool chain, you
see any problems?
> +- CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MAX_REG_SIZE:
> + Define the ns16550 max register size,
> + if the CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE is smaller than this value,
> + use padding to fill those gap.
This makes no sense to me. A register is always one specific size,
so the term "MAX_REG_SIZE" is bogus.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Landru! Guide us!
-- A Beta 3-oid, "The Return of the Archons", stardate 3157.4
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
