On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:58:50PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 09:40 -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 16:06-20240112, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > I am starting to wonder if > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20231101170519.39627-1-...@ti.com/ > > > > will help us here. > > > > > > Yes absolutely that would be perfect. Can i suggest we land it as > > > is > > > for now ("fat monolithic config") and once those patches land i'm > > > happy > > > to split things up? > > > > > > > https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/u-boot/2024-01-12#35590530 I > > think > > Tom agrees in principle (and Simon already acked), so we could go > > down > > this road and refactor - I am always a bit squeamish about redoing > > work > > if the baseline changes or has a reasonable chance of change.. Just > > doing it once and cleanly is my preference. > > Well lets see if this will land soonish then, that would be > amazing :) > > And yes, no doubt, doing it right the first time makes sense. On the > other hand I'm wary about adding more and more blockers for this set.
I've merged Andrew's patch for allowing defconfigs to use fragments this morning. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
