Albert, On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.arib...@free.fr> wrote: > Le 24/03/2011 16:08, Tom Warren a écrit : >> >> Albert, >> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.arib...@free.fr> >> wrote: >>> >>> Le 22/03/2011 20:27, Tom Warren a écrit : >>>> >>>> Albert, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.arib...@free.fr> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Le 23/02/2011 21:03, Tom Warren a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, I'm an idiot. I see now that I needed to add -n to format-patch to >>>>>> add the numbering to the [PATCH] header. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for the noise - resending now with the corrected patchset. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> Actually, for a single patch, you don't need to generate numbers, nor a >>>>> cover letter (the 0/N message). >>>> >>>> Is the current patch OK as is? It's a simple one-line change. >>> >>> I guess so. As soon as I get confirmation from Wolfgang that board >>> patches >>> can go through any tree, I'll apply it as a bugfix to master. > >> Great. Thanks! > > Applied to u-boot-arm/master. > >> Also, I saw your 'patches pending before release?' message. Have my >> Tegra 'A9 CPU' patches been applied to arm master? I'm still a little >> confused about the timing of the merge window vs. the release, and I'm >> not sure if the full set of Tegra patches will be in the next release. > > Sorry, I can't get them in in the upcoming release as I barely have time to > sort the pull req for today, but I'll get them on u-boot-arm/master as soon > as I can after that, so they'll be available on the ARM tree until the > following release, where they'll move to the mainline one. > Excellent - that's all I can ask. Thanks!
Tom > Amicalement, > -- > Albert. > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
