Albert, On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.arib...@free.fr> wrote: > Le 22/03/2011 20:27, Tom Warren a écrit : >> >> Albert, >> >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.arib...@free.fr> >> wrote: >>> >>> Le 23/02/2011 21:03, Tom Warren a écrit : >>>> >>>> OK, I'm an idiot. I see now that I needed to add -n to format-patch to >>>> add the numbering to the [PATCH] header. >>>> >>>> Sorry for the noise - resending now with the corrected patchset. >>>> >>>> Tom >>> >>> Actually, for a single patch, you don't need to generate numbers, nor a >>> cover letter (the 0/N message). >> >> Is the current patch OK as is? It's a simple one-line change. > > I guess so. As soon as I get confirmation from Wolfgang that board patches > can go through any tree, I'll apply it as a bugfix to master. Great. Thanks!
Also, I saw your 'patches pending before release?' message. Have my Tegra 'A9 CPU' patches been applied to arm master? I'm still a little confused about the timing of the merge window vs. the release, and I'm not sure if the full set of Tegra patches will be in the next release. Thanks, Tom > >> Thanks, >> Tom > > Amicalement, > -- > Albert. > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
