Le 24/03/2011 16:08, Tom Warren a écrit : > Albert, > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.arib...@free.fr> > wrote: >> Le 22/03/2011 20:27, Tom Warren a écrit : >>> >>> Albert, >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.arib...@free.fr> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Le 23/02/2011 21:03, Tom Warren a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> OK, I'm an idiot. I see now that I needed to add -n to format-patch to >>>>> add the numbering to the [PATCH] header. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for the noise - resending now with the corrected patchset. >>>>> >>>>> Tom >>>> >>>> Actually, for a single patch, you don't need to generate numbers, nor a >>>> cover letter (the 0/N message). >>> >>> Is the current patch OK as is? It's a simple one-line change. >> >> I guess so. As soon as I get confirmation from Wolfgang that board patches >> can go through any tree, I'll apply it as a bugfix to master.
> Great. Thanks! Applied to u-boot-arm/master. > Also, I saw your 'patches pending before release?' message. Have my > Tegra 'A9 CPU' patches been applied to arm master? I'm still a little > confused about the timing of the merge window vs. the release, and I'm > not sure if the full set of Tegra patches will be in the next release. Sorry, I can't get them in in the upcoming release as I barely have time to sort the pull req for today, but I'll get them on u-boot-arm/master as soon as I can after that, so they'll be available on the ARM tree until the following release, where they'll move to the mainline one. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
