On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:22:45AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, [snip] > > I think in hind-sight too much stuff is omitted without BOOTSTD_FULL. > > The option itself then enables other stuff too by default, but some > > parts of the bootflow command itself should be visible even without FULL > > to make things easier on the user. > > At the time the goal was to avoid growth compared to the distro > scripts. We could perhaps add some more things in with BOOTSTD_FULL > but still have it as an option?
Right. But now that we've tried this, some of the feedback has been that it's just too minimal right now. Like looking at the help message for bootflow, list and info should probably always be available. And maybe the flags for "scan" should be re-thought? Too late to change things now but "bootflow scan -b" should maybe how it's always been for "scan and boot". -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
