On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 07:49:04PM +0000, Shantur Rathore wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:18 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:52:02AM +0000, Shantur Rathore wrote: > > > > > Hi Tom / Kever > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:24 PM Shantur Rathore <i...@shantur.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Rockchip SoCs can support wide range of bootflows. > > > > Without full bootflow commands, it can be difficult to > > > > figure out issues if any, hence enable by default. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shantur Rathore <i...@shantur.com> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > (no changes since v1) > > > > > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > > > index d812685c98..fca6ef6d7e 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > > > @@ -1986,6 +1986,7 @@ config ARCH_ROCKCHIP > > > > imply CMD_DM > > > > imply DEBUG_UART_BOARD_INIT > > > > imply BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS > > > > + imply BOOTSTD_FULL if BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS > > > > imply FAT_WRITE > > > > imply SARADC_ROCKCHIP > > > > imply SPL_SYSRESET > > > > > > Can this please be merged in ? > > > > I wonder if we shouldn't really globally default to BOOTSTD_FULL if > > BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS for everyone. > > > > Its matter of ~21KB in size, unless any platform is really to its > limits it should be alright.
Maybe I need to re-check things too, since I wonder how much of that growth is re-enabling things that were removed when dropping the DISTRO stuff, and so for platforms just migrating over now it would be smaller in size if much. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
