Hi Jagan, On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 11:13 AM Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 10:54 PM Shantur Rathore <i...@shantur.com> wrote: > > > > Rockchip SoCs can support wide range of bootflows. > > Without full bootflow commands, it can be difficult to > > figure out issues if any, hence enable by default. > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shantur Rathore <i...@shantur.com> > > --- > > > > (no changes since v1) > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > index d812685c98..fca6ef6d7e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > @@ -1986,6 +1986,7 @@ config ARCH_ROCKCHIP > > imply CMD_DM > > imply DEBUG_UART_BOARD_INIT > > imply BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS > > + imply BOOTSTD_FULL if BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS > > Yes, but better to give this option to specific board vendors as > defaults are enough to boot 1st bootflow and what ever media's it has. >
Yes, that's correct it is enough to boot but by default there is no option to choose what to boot from. This was discussed in an earlier version of this patch [0] where I was explicitly enabling only for RP64. [0] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20231111001329.537704-...@shantur.com/ Kind regards, Shantur
