On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 2:40 PM Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I removed SPL support, which does not seems to be needed as the scufw
> handles DDR init.
>
> I don't have access to an imx8qm/qxp board here.
>
> Could you try removing SPL support from your board and see if it boots
> with binman support?
Ok, let's SPL for now as this is a different topic for discussion.
With the change below against u-boot-imx master-next branch, the
imx8qm/qxp boards build fine without blobs:
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi
index 3507489a813c..a3e0af48109b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx8qm-u-boot.dtsi
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
};
&binman {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SPL
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
u-boot-spl-ddr {
align = <4>;
align-size = <4>;
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
arch = "arm64";
compression = "none";
description = "U-Boot (64-bit)";
- load = <CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE>;
+ load = <CONFIG_TEXT_BASE>;
type = "standalone";
uboot-blob {
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi
index 01183f8ade63..7622c40906f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx8qxp-u-boot.dtsi
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
};
&binman {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SPL
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
u-boot-spl-ddr {
align = <4>;
align-size = <4>;
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
arch = "arm64";
compression = "none";
description = "U-Boot (64-bit)";
- load = <CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE>;
+ load = <CONFIG_TEXT_BASE>;
type = "standalone";
uboot-blob {
Could you please test it on your boards?
