On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 16:51:41 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > hrm, after running this through our test bench, it seems the old code and > > new code are not functionality equivalent. it boils down to default > > values when the env var is not set. some places interpret this to mean > > "yes" while others expect "no". getenv_yesno() takes the "no" default > > which doesnt always work. > > In addition to the default values, there is the difference that the > documentation states that "autostart" has to be set to "yes", i. e. a > plain "y" is not supposed to mean 'yes'.
consider it an enhancement then ? i dont see a problem with making the values fuzzier. personally, i make funcs like this accept any of the common strings such as true/false/0/1/y/n/yes/no. > > i can update the API to take a 2nd arg (the default value), or we can > > punt this patch. it's in "next", so there's less pressure to get it > > fixed immediately ... > > I think the easiest way to fix this is to revert the commit. it's in "next", so it could even just be dropped -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot