Dear Sean,
In message <d8447d79-f1d4-8a2f-39b9-a6650c936...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
...
> And yet, this is not the field we compete in. While bourne-style shells
> can take advantage of a multi-threaded environment, embedded shells tend
> to implement a much wider set of languages. See [1] for a survey of
> examples.
>
> [1] https://github.com/dbohdan/embedded-scripting-languages
"Embedded scripting languages" is probably not a good match for what
we are discussing. I don't think this comparison was made for
restricted boot loader environments, but for use in general purpose
/ embedded operating systems.
Hey, they even list Forth there. Maybe somebody should port
OpenBoot, so we can have a Forth interpreter as new commandline
language? We could implement device trees in the old, traditional
way then, too :-)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
There are bugs and then there are bugs. And then there are bugs.
- Karl Lehenbauer
