Hi Wolfgang, On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 01:53, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > > Dear Tom, > > In message <20210705185141.GA9516@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > I think I want to try and address this. While with "hush" we have > > something that's in heavy active development outside of U-Boot, with LIL > > we have something that's mature and "done". > > Mature? And still without consequent error checking? And done, > i. e. this will never be fixed? > > > > Tracking an active outside development is HARD and requires > > constant resync. > > Based on that logic we should stop supporting Linux, and stop using > DTs or file systems - all of these are under "active outside > development". > > This is a bogus argiment. > > > > Look at the last few > > LIL releases. That could be easily re-worked in to our fork if needed. > > I see that as a positive, not a negative. > > OK, this is your opinion. Mine differs. > > Please consider this as a full NAK from me when when you think of it > as a _replacement_ (even an optional one) of the standard shell. If > you like, have it added as an _additional_ command, of course fully > optional and without impact on the rest of U-Boot if not > intentionally selected.
That seems reasonable to me. There is certainly interest in these threads in reporting hush, perhaps with a goal of upstreaming the U-Boot-specific changes back to busybox. But so far no one has done it... Regards, Simon
