Andre Schwarz <andre.schw...@matrix-vision.de> wrote on 2010/10/25 16:46:42: > > Jocke, > > > Andre Schwarz<andre.schw...@matrix-vision.de> wrote on 2010/10/25 15:50:19: > > > >> Jocke, > >> > >> [snip] > >> > >> > >>> You still haven't reported weather the 4 nop's helped or not, yet you > >>> seek my help. I am just going to ignore you until you do test it. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> finally I got both some time and hardware : > >> > >> 4 nops after _start does the trick, i.e. the board is up and running fine. > >> > >> > >> Diffing both System.maps and U-Boot hexdump gives only trivial results : > >> > >> - "in_flash" and "_start_of_vectors" adress increment = 0x10. > >> - offset calculation for relative branch instruction also increases by > >> 0x10. > >> > >> > >> Let me know if you need more information or something else tested. > >> > > I am not looking at this as I am busy but I have an idea or two > > > ok - thanks. > > - CPU bug in 83xx CPUs which uses 0x110 as cold start vector. > > > This is indeed something FSL has to investigate. > But at least *some* 83xx boards are running fine ... e300c2 though.
I got a e300c2, mpc8321 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
