On 28.01.21 12:00, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 28.01.21 09:20, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> On 1/28/21 1:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:35:35PM -0800, Joel Peshkin wrote: >>> >>>> Add support for stack protector for UBOOT, SPL, and TPL >>>> as well as new pytest for stackprotector >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Peshkin <joel.pesh...@broadcom.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> >>> >>> Oddly enough this cases a number of the TPM2 tests to fail on sandbox: >>> https://dev.azure.com/u-boot/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=1706&view=logs&j=50449d1b-398e-53ae-48fa-6bf338edeb51&t=97605dd2-f5a5-5dd7-2118-315ffdc8bcd6&l=755 >>> >>> >> >> Thanks Tom for the head-up. >> >> The problem is reproducible locally using 'make tests' with the patch >> applied on top of origin/master. >> >> Best regards >> >> Heinrich > > The stack protector has successfully detected stack smashes. See below. > > A secondary finding is: panic("foo") without \n is not correctly flushed > to the console on the sandbox.
./test/py/test.py --bd=sandbox -ra --build-dir=build-sandbox -k='not test_stackprotector' shows no error for tpm2. ./test/py/test.py --bd=sandbox -ra --build-dir=build-sandbox -k='not test_stackprotector' shows the error for tpm2. I think the test test_stackprotector() is broken. I causes the sandbox to reset but does not wait until reaches the prompt again, e.g add u_boot_console.restart_uboot() instead of assert(true). @Joel Could you, please, submit a corrected patch. @Takahiro For test/py/tests/test_efi_capsule/test_capsule_firmware.py I always see a smash. Could you, please, have a look at efi_launch_capsules(). Best regards Heinrich > > test_tpm2_init: > > Stack smashing detected in function: > 00005563faa7c521 relocated from 000000000004d521 > > u-boot.map > 0x000000000004cf44 do_spi > 0x000000000004d9e9 print_byte_string > > It seems that the output written in the stack-protector test ends up in > the following test which happens to be test_tpm2_init: > > static int do_test_stackprot_fail(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, > char *const argv[]) > { > 4d4db: 48 81 ec 98 00 00 00 sub $0x98,%rsp > char a[128]; > > memset(a, 0xa5, 512); > 4d4e2: ba 00 02 00 00 mov $0x200,%edx > 4d4e7: be a5 00 00 00 mov $0xa5,%esi > { > 4d4ec: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax > 4d4f3: 00 00· > 4d4f5: 48 89 84 24 88 00 00 mov %rax,0x88(%rsp) > 4d4fc: 00· > 4d4fd: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax > memset(a, 0xa5, 512); > 4d4ff: 48 8d 7c 24 08 lea 0x8(%rsp),%rdi > 4d504: e8 1f 34 0d 00 callq 120928 <memset> > return 0; > } > 4d509: 48 8b 84 24 88 00 00 mov 0x88(%rsp),%rax > 4d510: 00· > 4d511: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax > 4d518: 00 00· > 4d51a: 74 05 je 4d521 > <do_test_stackprot_fail+0x46> > 4d51c: e8 68 48 02 00 callq 71d89 <__stack_chk_fail> >>>> 4d521: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax > 4d523: 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 add $0x98,%rsp > 4d52a: c3 retq··· > > > > TestEfiCapsuleFirmwareFit.test_efi_capsule_fw3 > #Stack smashing detected in function: > 000055827c21cb58 relocated from 00000000000d8b58 > > Here we seem to have a real finding. > > u-boot.map > 0x00000000000d7fae efi_launch_capsules > 0x00000000000da1ec set_shift_mask > > efi_set_variable_int(L"CapsuleLast", &efi_guid_capsule_report, > d8b10: 4c 8b 04 24 mov (%rsp),%r8 > d8b14: 45 31 c9 xor %r9d,%r9d > d8b17: 48 8d 35 42 1c 11 00 lea 0x111c42(%rip),%rsi > # 1ea760 <efi_guid_capsule_report> > d8b1e: b9 16 00 00 00 mov $0x16,%ecx > d8b23: ba 07 00 00 80 mov $0x80000007,%edx > d8b28: 48 8d 3d e7 61 0c 00 lea 0xc61e7(%rip),%rdi > # 19ed16 <__func__.0+0x132e6> > d8b2f: e8 34 ab 00 00 callq e3668 <efi_set_variable_int> > return ret; > d8b34: eb 0a jmp d8b40 > <efi_launch_capsules+0xb92> > return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR; > d8b36: 49 bc 07 00 00 00 00 movabs $0x8000000000000007,%r12 > d8b3d: 00 00 80· > } > d8b40: 48 8b 84 24 c8 00 00 mov 0xc8(%rsp),%rax > d8b47: 00· > d8b48: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax > d8b4f: 00 00· > d8b51: 74 05 je d8b58 > <efi_launch_capsules+0xbaa> > d8b53: e8 31 92 f9 ff callq 71d89 <__stack_chk_fail> >>>> d8b58: 48 81 c4 d8 00 00 00 add $0xd8,%rsp > d8b5f: 4c 89 e0 mov %r12,%rax > d8b62: 5b pop %rbx > d8b63: 5d pop %rbp > d8b64: 41 5c pop %r12 > d8b66: 41 5d pop %r13 > d8b68: 41 5e pop %r14 > d8b6a: 41 5f pop %r15 > d8b6c: c3 retq··· > > > Best regards > > Heinrich >