Dear "Hiremath, Vaibhav", In message <19f8576c6e063c45be387c64729e739404aa21c...@dbde02.ent.ti.com> you wrote: > > > Note that adding the definition may not be sufficient to get relocation > > working. > > > [Hiremath, Vaibhav] But atleast it will make code to compile cleanly. I feel, > at any cost we should not add such patches which will break compilation, > the code should build always.
If the code compiles without problems, but then fails to run, the situation would be only worse. It is MUCH BETTER to roar a clear and unmistakable error message into the face of the user so everybody gets aware that some work needs to be done to fix these boards rather than to hush up the problems, in which case nobody would do anything, and a much bigger turmoil would start when the feature removel time comes and all these broken boards get removed from the tree, Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Was heißt Windows auf Indianisch? - "Weißer Mann, der auf Sanduhr wartet!" _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
