Hi Heinrich, On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 12:23, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi Heinrich, > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 11:35, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.deb...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > On 05.08.20 19:13, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > On 28.07.20 20:57, Simon Glass wrote: > > >> On x86 various files that need to be created by binman. It does not make > > >> sense to enumerate these in the Makefile. They are described in the > > >> configuration (devicetree) for each board and we can simply run binman > > >> (always) to generate them. > > >> > > >> Update the Makefile to have a separate, final step which runs binman, > > >> once all input dependencies are present. > > >> > > >> This avoid sprinkling the Makefile with arch-specific code. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > >> --- > > >> > > >> (no changes since v3) > > >> > > >> Changes in v3: > > >> - Drop rockchip changes which should not be in this patch > > >> > > >> Makefile | 63 +++++++++++++------------------------------------------- > > >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks! > > >> > > > > > > Dear Simon, > > > > > > since this patch merged as 42b18df80fdb network is broken on the > > > pine64-lts_defconfig: > > > > > > Net: phy interface7 > > > Could not get PHY for ethernet@1c30000: addr 1 > > > No ethernet found. > > > > > > => dhcp > > > phy interface7 > > > mdio_register: non unique device name 'ethernet@1c30000' > > > Could not get PHY for ethernet@1c30000: addr 1 > > > > > > Please, provide a fix. > > > > The last build steps with your patch are: > > > > cat spl/sunxi-spl.bin u-boot.itb > u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin > > ./tools/binman/binman --toolpath ./tools build -u -d u-boot.dtb -O . > > -m --allow-missing -I . -I . -I ./board/sunxi > > > > The file before binman is ok. After binman u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin is > > broken. > > > > Nowhere in the commit message you state that you want to run binman on > > sunxi boards.
BTW the commit does not change this. Sunxi boards were already using binman. > > Please see the existing thread with Andre. I'm going to take another > look at this later today. - simon