Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <201009030946.22440...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> IIRC, then the main reason for this is the code size reduction. Using your
> version would increase the code size quite a bit. But I concur, it would be
> much better readable. So just let me know, and I'll try to come up with a
> patch cleaning this up a bit.
Maybe some common parts (like "AMCC PowerPC ") could be split off.
For the rest, the compelex code needs also space, so I'm not sure
about the end result.
> As described in some comments, the problem is that some SoC's have the same
> PVR (for example 440EP rev C and 440GR rev B have same PVR). I have no idea
> how this identification could be solved without such ifdef's.
I see.
> But you are right. Some of the ifdef's can be removed. Again, this would also
> result in a bigger image size though.
Really? We should measure the effect.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..."
-- Isaac Asimov
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
