Hi Wolfgang, > Dear Anatolij Gustschin, > > In message <1271254909-20398-4-git-send-email-ag...@denx.de> you wrote: >> Adds coprocessor communication POST code. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <ag...@denx.de> >> --- >> board/pdm360ng/Makefile | 1 + >> board/pdm360ng/post.c | 75 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/configs/pdm360ng.h | 5 +++ >> include/post.h | 1 + >> post/tests.c | 13 +++++++ >> 5 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 board/pdm360ng/post.c > ... >> --- a/post/tests.c >> +++ b/post/tests.c >> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ extern int gdc_post_test (int flags); >> extern int fpga_post_test (int flags); >> extern int lwmon5_watchdog_post_test(int flags); >> extern int sysmon1_post_test(int flags); >> +extern int pdm360ng_coprocessor_post_test(int flags); >> >> extern int sysmon_init_f (void); >> >> @@ -286,6 +287,18 @@ struct post_test post_list[] = >> #if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_BSPEC5 >> CONFIG_POST_BSPEC5, >> #endif >> +#if CONFIG_POST & CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC >> + { >> + "Coprocessors communication test", >> + "coproc_com", >> + "This test checks communication with coprocessors.", >> + POST_RAM | POST_ALWAYS | POST_CRITICAL, >> + &pdm360ng_coprocessor_post_test, >> + NULL, >> + NULL, >> + CONFIG_SYS_POST_COPROC >> + } >> +#endif >> }; > > I don't want to see board specific code (pdm360ng_*) in such a global > file. Please use a more generic approach.
Do you mean like for example CONFIG_POST_BSPEC1 used for lwmon5? Anatolij, this should be straight forward. Cheers Detlev -- C hasn't changed much since the 1970s. And let's face it it's ugly. Can't we do better? C++? (Sorry, never mind.) -- Rob Pike -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: d...@denx.de _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot