On 11/20/2018 04:21 PM, Sven Schwermer wrote: > Hi again, > >> On 20 Nov 2018, at 15:14, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de >> <mailto:ma...@denx.de>> wrote: >> >> On 11/20/2018 03:10 PM, Sven Schwermer wrote: >>> >>>>> Well, since CONFIG_SPL_DM_USB depends on SPL_DM_USB, I don’t think >>>>> that’s the case. >>>> >>>> Are you _sure_ ? Sorry if I'm being hard, but this affects a lot of >>>> users, so I have to be cautious. >>> >>> I am _not_ sure. That’s why I used the verb “think” ;-) I’m sorry, >>> but I don’t think I can provide the guarantees you need. How can we >>> investigate this systematically? >> >> I think you can just run make $board_defconfig for all boards (I don't >> think you need toolchain to do that) and verify that the option didn't >> get enabled in the resulting .config . > > I can confirm that after applying this series, no board has > CONFIG_SPL_DM_USB=y that does not have CONFIG_DM_USB=y. Why is it > necessary to check this? Do we not trust the Kconfig dependencies? Or > did I misunderstand you and that’s what you wanted me to check?
But DM_USB is DM and USB in U-Boot proper and it doesn't imply that SPL should have DM or USB support. I want to be sure that some boards don't suddenly grow DM or USB support in SPL if it wasn't there before. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
