>> Well, since CONFIG_SPL_DM_USB depends on SPL_DM_USB, I don’t think that’s >> the case. > > Are you _sure_ ? Sorry if I'm being hard, but this affects a lot of > users, so I have to be cautious.
I am _not_ sure. That’s why I used the verb “think” ;-) I’m sorry, but I don’t think I can provide the guarantees you need. How can we investigate this systematically? > >>> btw I don't think SPL_DM_USB should depend on DM_USB , one is for SPL >>> and the other for U-Boot. >> >> Aha! There are two reasons I did this: >> 1) I used CONFIG_SPL_DM_MMC as the inspiration for my changes. That one >> depends on CONFIG_DM_MMC. > > I don't think that's right. SPL and U-Boot are separate things. Agreed. >> 2) In order to not break a lot of configs, see above. >> >> If this is unacceptable for you, I guess, I’ll have to revisit this. That’d >> make this series a lot bigger I think. Tell me your preference. > > I don't mind bigger and better series, but let's just answer the > question first. I’m just afraid, that this is more likely to break existing boards. Sven _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
