>> Well, since CONFIG_SPL_DM_USB depends on SPL_DM_USB, I don’t think that’s 
>> the case.
> 
> Are you _sure_ ? Sorry if I'm being hard, but this affects a lot of
> users, so I have to be cautious.

I am _not_ sure. That’s why I used the verb “think” ;-) I’m sorry, but I don’t 
think I can provide the guarantees you need. How can we investigate this 
systematically?

> 
>>> btw I don't think SPL_DM_USB should depend on DM_USB , one is for SPL
>>> and the other for U-Boot.
>> 
>> Aha! There are two reasons I did this:
>> 1) I used CONFIG_SPL_DM_MMC as the inspiration for my changes. That one 
>> depends on CONFIG_DM_MMC.
> 
> I don't think that's right. SPL and U-Boot are separate things.

Agreed.

>> 2) In order to not break a lot of configs, see above.
>> 
>> If this is unacceptable for you, I guess, I’ll have to revisit this. That’d 
>> make this series a lot bigger I think. Tell me your preference.
> 
> I don't mind bigger and better series, but let's just answer the
> question first.

I’m just afraid, that this is more likely to break existing boards.

Sven
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to