On 10/22/2018 09:55 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > On 18.10.2018 23:04, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 10/18/2018 10:20 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: >>> >>> Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com <mailto:marek.va...@gmail.com>> >>> schrieb am Do., 18. Okt. 2018, 22:15: >>> >>> On 10/18/2018 09:28 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: >>> > Hi Marek, >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> > I was playing with updating the dts files for cyclone5 (and >>> arria5) from >>> > current kernel sources, but I found that the kernel as 4 >>> boards that >>> > U-Boot doesn't have and U-Boot has 6 boards that the kernel >>> doesn't have. >>> >>> Thanks for doing this, really appreciated (even though it probably >>> doesn't look that way most of the time). >>> >>> And yikes, which boards are where , can you list the problematic >>> ones? >>> >>> > How should I proceed here? Should I copy new boards from the >>> kernel? >>> > Should I keep U-Boot-only boards and try to adjust them to >>> changes (if >>> > any)? >>> >>> I'd say sync as much as possible with kernel and the rest, >>> update. I >>> don't think there are any real board specific things which would >>> prevent >>> the update in those DTs missing in the kernel. >>> >>> >>> Ok, I'll just try and prepare a patch that ports the existing boards and >>> mentions the boards not ported from current kernel sources. I don't want >>> to remove boards from U-Boot, so we'll just have to test those not in >>> Linux. >> Sounds good! > > What about the license header? Should we keep the original header for > sync'ed device trees or change it to SPDX?
SPDX please. Even better, fix it in the kernel too :) -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
