On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:46 PM, David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> wrote: > On 01/02/2018 02:39 PM, Adam Ford wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:25 PM, David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/02/2018 01:55 PM, Adam Ford wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:05 PM, David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 01/02/2018 12:45 PM, Adam Ford wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This converts the following to Kconfig: >>>>>> CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX >>>>>> CONFIG_SOC_DA850 >>>>>> CONFIG_DA850_LOWLEVEL >>>>>> CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM >>>>>> CONFIG_SYS_DA850_PLL_INIT >>>>>> CONFIG_SYS_DA850_DDR_INIT >>>>>>
>> > > I didn't dig that deep, so sounds good to me. However, if you are always > enabling SYS_DA850_PLL_INIT and SYS_DA850_DDR_INIT when da850_low_level.c > is compiled, then you might as well just remove those options altogether. > They are not used outside of da850_low_level.c and it would clean up a > bunch of #ifdefs. I don't want to make changes to .C source code yet. At this time, my goal is to limit it to Kconfig and defconfig files. I'll clean this up a bit more and run some tests. I think I'll make some notes to go back through it and remove the #ifdef's at a later date. I want to be able to bisect to this point if something breaks. Once I'm confident everyone will be OK with this, I think what you're saying makes a lot of sense. adam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot