On 01/02/2018 01:55 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:05 PM, David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> wrote:
On 01/02/2018 12:45 PM, Adam Ford wrote:

This converts the following to Kconfig:
     CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX
     CONFIG_SOC_DA850
     CONFIG_DA850_LOWLEVEL
     CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM
     CONFIG_SYS_DA850_PLL_INIT
     CONFIG_SYS_DA850_DDR_INIT

Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford...@gmail.com>
---
Changes in V4:
         Rebase against origin/master

Changes in V3:
         Add bool for DA850_LOWLEVEL and make it select DA850_PLL_INIT and
           DA850_DDR_INIT


It looks like da850_lowlevel.o is also compiled when CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and
CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX are both defined, so this change will most likely break SPL
builds. So, probably best to just leave DA850_PLL_INIT and DA850_DDR_INIT
alone for now.


Any objections to keeping the migration of DA850_PLL_INIT and
DA850_DDR_INIT if I change the dependencies to set both of them when
either DA850_LOWLEVEL or SPL is defined?

Wouldn't that change the EA20 board since it currently does not select
DA850_PLL_INIT or DA850_DDR_INIT?


adam

         Make OMAPL138_LCDK select SOC_DA8XX instead of SOC_DA850.  The
name of
           CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX was left alone here since it wasn't my goal to
change
           the naming convention.
         WhileDA850 is probably correct, it would technically be a change
to the
           compiled code and that wasn't the goal here.



_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to