On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:05 PM, David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> wrote: > On 01/02/2018 12:45 PM, Adam Ford wrote: >> >> This converts the following to Kconfig: >> CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX >> CONFIG_SOC_DA850 >> CONFIG_DA850_LOWLEVEL >> CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM >> CONFIG_SYS_DA850_PLL_INIT >> CONFIG_SYS_DA850_DDR_INIT >> >> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford...@gmail.com> >> --- >> Changes in V4: >> Rebase against origin/master >> >> Changes in V3: >> Add bool for DA850_LOWLEVEL and make it select DA850_PLL_INIT and >> DA850_DDR_INIT > > > It looks like da850_lowlevel.o is also compiled when CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and > CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX are both defined, so this change will most likely break SPL > builds. So, probably best to just leave DA850_PLL_INIT and DA850_DDR_INIT > alone for now. >
Any objections to keeping the migration of DA850_PLL_INIT and DA850_DDR_INIT if I change the dependencies to set both of them when either DA850_LOWLEVEL or SPL is defined? adam > >> Make OMAPL138_LCDK select SOC_DA8XX instead of SOC_DA850. The >> name of >> CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX was left alone here since it wasn't my goal to >> change >> the naming convention. >> WhileDA850 is probably correct, it would technically be a change >> to the >> compiled code and that wasn't the goal here. >> > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
