Hi Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > I see that, although it is adding to the fpga header so presumably > making it harder for someone to move this over.
Yes, I'm not happy with changing the header and even xilinx C file to add functionality for altera. However, this is due to the fact that a core file still depends on an dogs implementation, which I removed. > Does anyone on cc know the plan fr conversion of FPGA to driver model? > It does not look too tricky from a quick look at the header file. It does not look tricky, indeed. However, we should try to match this to the Linux implementation regarding what's needed in the device tree. And I just don't know that part, yet ;-) Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
