Hi,

> Simon Glass wrote:
> On 10 November 2017 at 07:17, Goldschmidt Simon <sgoldschmidt@de.pepperl-
> fuchs.com> wrote:
> > This drops the limit that fpga is only loaded from FIT images for Xilinx.
> > This is done by moving the 'partial' check from 'common/image.c' to
> > 'drivers/fpga/xilinx.c' (the only driver supporting partial images
> > yet) and supplies a weak default implementation in 'drivers/fpga/fpga.c'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <sgoldschm...@de.pepperl-fuchs.com>
> > ---
> >  common/bootm.c        |  2 +-
> >  common/image.c        |  6 ++----
> >  drivers/fpga/fpga.c   |  9 +++++++++
> >  drivers/fpga/xilinx.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  include/fpga.h        |  1 +
> >  5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> I think the FPGA subsystem should move to driver model.

I can understand the need for that. However, I don't have the expertise
to do so, I guess. Also, I would have thought this requirement would be
raised to someone actually adding/changing fpga code (like the recent
Intel activities on this list).

In contrast to this, I see my patch more like cleaning the code, moving
Xilinx dependent code from 'common/image.c' to 'drivers/fpga/xilinx.c'.
This cleanup in the common directory is rather independent of migrating
the fpga subsystem to driver model.


Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to