On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On 08.08.2017 17:57, Joe Hershberger wrote: >> >> Hi Stefan (and Stefan), >> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> On 11.07.2017 10:04, Stefan Roese wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21.06.2017 10:31, stef...@malvell.com wrote: >> >> >> Huh? Sent from a typo email address? > > > Where is the problem with the Stefan Chulski's email address? > Sorry, I can't spot it.
Just above and in the reply-to of the messages: stefanc@ma>l<vell.com >> That's pretty tedious. I >> recommend fixing your git config. And if that's fine, I recommend >> using patman so this won't happen again. >> >>>>> >>>>> From: Stefan Chulski <stef...@marvell.com> >>>>> >>>>> Issues were found during internal QA phase. >>>>> >>>>> Stefan Chulski (10): >>>>> net: mvpp2x: Add GPIO configuration support >>>>> net: mvpp2x: fix phy connected to wrong mdio issue >>>>> net: mvpp2x: Enable GoP packet padding in TX >>>>> net: mvpp2x: fix BM configuration overrun issue >>>>> net: mvpp2x: decrease size of AGGR_TXQ and CPU_DESC_CHUNK >>>>> net: mvpp2x: remove MBUS configurations from MvPP22 driver >>>>> net: mvpp2x: Remove IRQ configuration from u-boot >>>>> net: mvpp2x: Set BM pool high address >>>>> net: mvpp2x: remove TX drain from transmit routine >>>>> net: mvpp2x: Set BM poll size once during priv probe >>>>> >>>>> drivers/net/mvpp2.c | 189 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- >>>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Joe, do you have any comments on these mvpp2 patches? >>> >>> >>> >>> Gently ping on these patches again. Joe, do you have any comments >>> on these? Do you want to take these patches via your tree? Or >>> should I push them if you don't have any objections? >> >> >> Reviewing now. I generally use patchwork to remember what I have to >> do. I guess if I didn't rely on that I would set up better work queue >> email filters. Sorry for the delay. >> >> I figured since the series is assigned to you in PW, that you wanted >> it through your tree. I'm fine either way. > > > I assume that Tom assigned them to me (I didn't do it at least). > But I can definitely pull these patches via the Marvell tree, once > all open issues are resolved and all patches have your Acked-by > tag. Sounds good! > Thanks for the review! > > Thanks, > Stefan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
