On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 03:34:10AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > On 30 July 2017 at 20:46, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On 07/28/2017 11:40 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi Jaehoon, > >> > >> On 28 July 2017 at 06:25, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> wrote: > >>> Dear Simon, > >>> > >>> On 07/27/2017 11:43 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > >>>> On 07/23/2017 02:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > >>>>> (pruning the cc list a bit) > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Jaehoon, > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4 July 2017 at 13:48, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > >>>>>> This series completes the conversion of SATA to driver model. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Previous work converted SCSI including the SCSI-based SATA driver. This > >>>>>> series converts the AHCI uclass itself, adding operations and adjusting > >>>>>> the 'sata' command to work correctly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> An existing board (Compulab Utilite) is used for this work. It uses > >>>>>> SATA > >>>>>> without the SCSI layer. Unfortunately this board does not currently use > >>>>>> driver model for MMC or USB, nor does it include a device tree. > >>>>>> Therefore > >>>>>> additional patches are included in this series to convert this over. > >>>>>> Note > >>>>>> that USB is rendered inoperative since the relevant device-tree nodes > >>>>>> are > >>>>>> disabled. Further work is needed here (e.g. by the board maintainer) > >>>>>> but > >>>>>> it is well beyond the objective of this series. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> A long-standing niggle with MMC has been the CONFIG_DM_MMC_OPS option. > >>>>>> This was introduced to allow driver model to handle MMC operations > >>>>>> rather > >>>>>> than having them in struct mmc. This was needed since the original > >>>>>> uclass > >>>>>> did not have support for operations. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> At present i.MX is the only SoC that defines CONFIG_DM_MMC without > >>>>>> CONFIG_DM_MMC_OPS. With this driver converted, the option is no longer > >>>>>> necessary so this series takes the opportunity to drop that option. > >>>>> > >>>>> Are you planning to review / apply this series please? It is assigned > >>>>> to you in patchwork. I'd like to resolve this because I have two other > >>>>> series depending on it > >>>> > >>>> Sorry..I had holidays..will check this week. > >>> > >>> Apologized for late..I'm checking this patchset and testing with my board. > >>> (But there is some conflict...so i needs to check more...what i missed.) > >> > >> If you like I could rebase it and resend. The series is at > >> u-boot-dm/ata2-working. > > > > Thanks for resending v2! > > Do you think this can go in soon? Are there any problems / comments to > address? > > We are already after rc1 so I am getting a bit nervous!
Yes, I would like to see this come in ASAP, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
