Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
<of5a3af402.57efbd26-onc125767e.007a9cc5-c125767e.007b6...@transmode.se> you
wrote:
>
> > Yes. And all boards that don't need it will suffer from the increased
> > memory footprint.
>
> Sure, but I won't adding these extra call sites as an array of
> fptrs also add size? Since the new function as smaller than the current
> list, I would not be surprised if my function idea is smaller
> in total. Perhaps I am misunderstanding something?
>
> I am just illustrating one way, one that will allow boards
> better control too as then can define this function as they like/need.
The idea is that boards that want such contrrol can redefine the
whole init sequence list - adding what they really need, and omitting
what they don't. Zero overhead.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
There is an order of things in this universe.
-- Apollo, "Who Mourns for Adonais?" stardate 3468.1
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
