Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message <of9f9c7491.8e6ab1ce-onc125767e.00448fda-c125767e.00453...@transmode.se> you wrote: > Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote on 27/11/2009 21:18:28: > > I am not convinced yet that the new code is actually an improvement. > > Changing the array of pointers into a list of function calls does not > > solve any of the real issues we have with the init seuqnece - like > > that some board need the PCI initialization early, and others later, > > etc. > > Somewhat offtopic, but you could add a few weak empty dummy functions > at strategic places in the board_X funcs. Any board that > needs some extra init sequence could define the appropriate function > which will replace the weak one.
Yes. And all boards that don't need it will suffer from the increased memory footprint. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de There's an old story about the person who wished his computer were as easy to use as his telephone. That wish has come true, since I no longer know how to use my telephone. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
