Hello Wolfgang. Thanks for looking at my patch-set.
>> + printf("%s:%s\n", __FILE__, __func__); > > Guess this should be debug() instead? Actually, this was meant to be removed in final code. As explained in the 0/8 message, this patch set was mainly and RFC, as some of the stuff looked questionable to me. So I chose to post my current status to get some comments on the approach, not on the details which I know were just work in progress, though working on real hardware. So, unless there are serious issues, I'll clean up my current tree, add comments to each patch and repost as V2. thanks /alessandro _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot