Hello Wolfgang.
Thanks for looking at my patch-set.
>> + printf("%s:%s\n", __FILE__, __func__);
>
> Guess this should be debug() instead?
Actually, this was meant to be removed in final code. As explained in
the 0/8 message, this patch set was mainly and RFC, as some of the
stuff looked questionable to me. So I chose to post my current status
to get some comments on the approach, not on the details which I know
were just work in progress, though working on real hardware.
So, unless there are serious issues, I'll clean up my current
tree, add comments to each patch and repost as V2.
thanks
/alessandro
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
