Hi Jagan, El 7/6/17 a las 9:30, Jagan Teki escribió: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas > <nolt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Command bytes are part of the written bytes and they should be taken into >> account when sending a spi transfer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <nolt...@gmail.com> >> --- >> v2: Introduce changes requested by Simon Glass: >> - Always include command bytes when determining max write size. >> >> drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c | 2 +- >> include/spi.h | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c >> index e44c10f..5b8cbc9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c >> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ int spi_flash_cmd_write_ops(struct spi_flash *flash, u32 >> offset, >> >> if (spi->max_write_size) >> chunk_len = min(chunk_len, >> - (size_t)spi->max_write_size); >> + spi->max_write_size - len); > > This can be squashed with 01/10 with proper commit message? I think it's better if we keep it as two patches, because they are different features...
> > thanks! > Thanks. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
